The lending landscape has shifted significantly in recent years. As traditional banks tighten their lending criteria, a new wave of…
The lending landscape has shifted significantly in recent years. As traditional banks tighten their lending criteria, a new wave of lenders, often with deep sector expertise has emerged. These lenders are not only more agile but also more hands-on when it comes to managing distressed situations within their loan books.
One increasingly common strategy in such scenarios is the credit bid, a powerful tool that enables lenders to take control of a business or asset while leaving behind existing shareholders. Though originally rooted in US insolvency legislation, credit bids have become an established practice in the UK, despite the absence of a statutory framework.
What is a Credit Bid?
In a typical credit bid scenario, a lender enforces its security by appointing administrators or receivers. These insolvency practitioners then sell the business or assets to a lender-controlled special purpose vehicle (SPV). Instead of paying cash, the lender “bids” its secured debt, covering principal and accrued interest, against the purchase price. From the seller’s perspective, this is treated as cash consideration, and the lender’s debt is reduced accordingly.
While largely non-cash, some cash is usually required to cover transaction costs.
When should a lender consider a Credit Bid?
Credit bids aren’t suitable for every situation. More conventional outcomes such as refinancing, consensual restructuring, or an M&A exit may be simpler and more effective. However, a credit bid may be appropriate when:
Tactical considerations
Beyond financial logic, credit bids can serve tactical purposes:
Who can Credit Bid?
Credit bids are typically executed by secured lenders and are most straightforward in bilateral or single-lender syndicated arrangements. In syndicated deals, collaboration is essential due to intercreditor protections around security releases and cash consideration.
While dissenting lenders can be cashed out at a pro-rata level, significant payouts may reduce the appeal of a credit bid. If intercreditor provisions don’t allow binding dissenters, more complex tools like Schemes of Arrangement or Restructuring Plans may be required, adding cost and complexity.
Credit bids are generally not viable for unsecured creditors, as the debt release alone rarely satisfies administrators, and cash leakage tends to be higher.
Pros and Cons of Credit Bids
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Credit bids are not a one-size-fits-all solution, but they can be a highly effective tool in the right circumstances. For lenders with sector expertise and a long-term view, they offer a route to control, recovery, and value creation.
If you’re considering a credit bid or would like to explore whether it’s the right approach for a particular situation, please don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Though originally rooted in US insolvency legislation, credit bids have become an established practice in the UK, despite the absence of a statutory framework.